Goals

  1. I want to pursue the connections between the church fathers and the doctrine of the soul.

  2. I believe that a patristic understanding of the soul allows for real healing.

  3. Physical healing often needs physical treatments.  However, there is also a correlation between neuroscience and philosophy of the mind (see the book Heartmath).

  4. This is critical in terms of pastoral counseling, as the recent disasters in Moscow, ID make clear.  Telling victims to “get over it” and not go to court, besides tampering with witnesses (which is illegal), ignores many dimensions which remained unhealed.

  5. Healing must be total and wholistic, which many of the Fathers intuitively recognized.

  6. While I can’t agree with some of the theological overtones behind monastic theology, there are interesting parallels between the monastics and later psychology (at least at its best)

    1. Monastics urged one to confide in a confessor.  Not so much to “get my sins forgiven,” but to reveal what my baggage is.

    2. A strict diet of good foods (which does include fasting) and self-denial makes the acolyte acknowledge weak points.

    3. While I can’t buy into Hesychast models of prayer, there are different breathing methods that calm the body and some scholars suggest a parallel between the physical heart and the mind (Moreland, Kingdom Triangle, ch. 6).  Interestingly, the fathers often spoke of “nous” and the “heart.”

  7. This blog has been very harsh on “convertskii.”  I’ve now come to the point that if someone wants to convert to Rome or EO, there is little I can do to stop him.  Nor really should I.  Contrary to some convertskii narratives, we do make choices and do use our sinful western rational judgment.  St Paul says every man stands or falls before his own master.   However, I’ve come to realize that some people might have defensible rationales (!!!) for becoming EO.  I’m here to help that person either stay Protestant or make an informed judgment on EO before jumping ship only to find the same garbage elsewhere.

  8. I want my new blog to help on the narratives. I’ve realized that I probably know more about Russian and Balkan history than 99% of Americans (and more than 100% of news anchors). I know how tempting it is to paint Kosovo Poltje as a crisis point. I want to deconstruct a few narratives while still affirming what is good in those narratives.
  9. And I realize I’ve read a lot about the church fathers. I don’t want to boast but neither will I engage in false humility. And I’ve come to realize that the picture is very complicated. The Fathers affirmed a lot of things I probably won’t affirm, yet we don’t see them (at least early on) affirming what Convertskii want them to affirm.
  10. Once I made peace with myself that Protestants can experience Kingdom Power, go to heaven, and the like, I realized I didn’t need to change my church identity based on someone else’s narrative about his own salvation (Orthodox Bridge).
Advertisements

Author: Ephraim's Arrow

Interests include patristics, the role of the soul in the human person, analytic theology, charismatic gifts

1 thought on “Goals”

  1. You should add

    “…and the Tao became flesh” by Henry McGrath (cites Fr. Rose and Hieromonk Damascene)
    as well as
    “Dragon Rises, Red Bird Flies” by Leon Hammer
    to your reading list.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s