Speech Act and Irony

The irony is that people think I am a Barthian because I recommended Torrance’s lectures on the Nicene Creed.  Of course, such a mentality is representative of the Reformed internetskii.  If they don’t want to grow and become mature in knowledge, that’s their choice.  I have to respect that.

True, I like Barth’s view of the exalted role of preaching and the Freedom of God to Act.  Indeed, Reformed people, if you want to hold to the doctrine of the Filioque, you better line up with Barth.  If you don’t, Energetic Procession will eat you alive.

But Barth isn’t good enough.  He needs to be put on stable ground.  Therefore, when I discovered Kevin Vanhoozer’s speech-act theory, that was what I needed.

 

Advertisements

About Ephraim's Arrow

Interests include patristics, the role of the soul in the human person, analytic theology, Reformed Scholasticism
This entry was posted in Autobiography and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s